HomeFamily lawOther decrees

What Does a Decree of Judicial Separation Do?

It relieves the petitioner of the obligation to cohabit and nothing else — except for three specific changes in section 43: either party may sue the other in contract or tort, intestate property devolves as if the deceased had survived, and an unpaid husband becomes liable for necessaries.

The family law series, no. 65 · Nullity, separation and other decrees · 5 min read

Section 42 of the Matrimonial Causes Act (Chapter 282) states the effect narrowly, and section 43 then makes three specific changes.

Section 42

Section 42

A decree of judicial separation relieves the petitioner from the obligation to cohabit with the other party to the marriage while the decree remains in operation, but, except as provided by this Division, does not otherwise affect the marriage or the status, rights and obligations of the parties.

What remains unchanged

The parties remain married. So:

Note the words “relieves the petitioner”. On the face of it the decree operates in favour of the party who obtained it.

Section 43 — three specific changes

Section 43(1) — suing each other

While a decree is in operation, either party may bring proceedings in contract or in tort against the other party.

Section 43(2) — intestacy

Where a party dies intestate as to any property while a decree is in operation, the property devolves as if he had survived the other party to the marriage.

Section 43(3) — necessaries

Where, on or in consequence of the making of a decree, a husband is ordered to pay maintenance to his wife and the maintenance is not duly paid, the husband is liable for necessaries supplied for the wife’s use.

What section 43 changes
SubjectBefore the decreeWhile the decree is in operation
Suing each otherRestricted at common law between spousesPermitted in contract and tort
Intestate successionThe surviving spouse takesProperty devolves as if the deceased had survived the other — so the separated spouse does not take
NecessariesA husband in default on maintenance is liable for necessaries supplied to the wife
Section 43(2) is the provision most likely to surprise

A judicial separation does not end the marriage — but it does end intestate succession between the parties.

The deeming is one-directional in form: the property devolves as if the deceased had survived the other party. The practical effect is that the separated spouse does not inherit on intestacy.

That makes it important for a party who obtains a decree of judicial separation to review their will. The section addresses intestacy only; a will in favour of the separated spouse continues to operate according to its terms.

Section 43(3) and the common law of necessaries

The rule that a deserted or separated wife could pledge her husband’s credit for necessaries is preserved here in statutory form, but made conditional: it applies where maintenance has been ordered and is not duly paid.

Its practical use is limited, but it gives a supplier a direct remedy against a defaulting husband and so assists a wife left without support. The primary remedies remain the enforcement provisions in Part X — see how a maintenance order is enforced.

Section 44 — joint powers

This Division does not prevent a wife, during separation under a decree, from joining in the exercise of any power given to herself and her husband jointly.

So a decree does not disable the parties from acting together where a power — under a trust, a settlement or a joint appointment — requires both. See also the Married Women’s Property Act (Chapter 281), section 4 of which deals with joint powers.

Section 46 — discharge on resumption of cohabitation

Section 46

(1) Where, after a decree has been made, the parties have voluntarily resumed cohabitation, either party may apply for an order discharging the decree.

(2) On such an application, the Court shall make an order discharging the decree if both parties consent, or if the Court is otherwise satisfied that the parties have voluntarily resumed cohabitation.

Discharge is mandatory once the fact is established

The word is “shall”. Where the parties have genuinely resumed living together, the decree goes.

Either party may apply, and the consent of both is one route but not the only one — the Court may act if otherwise satisfied that cohabitation has voluntarily resumed.

The consequence is that the section 43 changes fall away: intestate succession is restored, and the parties are again in the ordinary position of spouses.

Section 47 — older decrees

Sections 43 to 46 apply to a decree of judicial separation made before the commencement date by a court in the country as well as to one made after it.

So a decree made before 8 July 1965 carries the same consequences, and may be discharged under section 46 in the same way.

For what happens if the parties later wish to divorce, see dissolution after judicial separation under section 45.

Check the section yourself

Before relying on anything here, read the current text of the Marriage Act (Chapter 280) and check for later amendments. If a decision matters to you, get advice — start with the Office of the Public Solicitor, or find a firm in the law firms directory.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about Papua New Guinea law and does not constitute legal advice. Laws may change, and their application depends on individual circumstances. You should obtain professional legal advice for your specific situation. Read the full disclaimer.