HomeFamily lawVoid and voidable

What Is the Difference Between a Void and a Voidable Marriage?

A void marriage never existed in law and anyone with an interest may say so, at any time. A voidable marriage is fully valid until a court sets it aside, only the parties can seek that, and it stays valid if nobody does.

The family law series, no. 26 · Void and voidable marriages · 5 min read

The Marriage Act (Chapter 280) deals with both in Part IV: section 17 for void marriages, section 22 for voidable ones. The consequences differ substantially.

The comparison

Void and voidable marriages compared
Void — s 17Voidable — s 22
StatusNever a marriage. No legal effect at any timeA valid marriage until set aside
Court order needed?No — the marriage is void whether or not a court says soYes — only a court can end it
Who can raise itAnyone with a legitimate interest — including third parties and after the death of a partyThe parties, by petition
WhenAt any time, including in other proceedingsWhile both parties live, subject to the restrictions in s 38 of the Matrimonial Causes Act
If nobody actsStill voidRemains a valid marriage
RemarriageFree to remarry — but a decree is prudent as proofMust obtain a decree first; otherwise the second marriage is void and is bigamy
GroundsExisting marriage; prohibited degrees; defective form; no real consent; under marriageable ageIncapacity to consummate; unsoundness of mind or mental defectiveness; communicable venereal disease; wife pregnant by another

Why a void marriage needs no order

Section 17 declares the position, it does not confer a remedy

Section 17 says a marriage “is void” on the stated grounds. It operates by force of the section itself.

So the invalidity can be raised anywhere it matters: in a probate dispute, in a claim to superannuation, in a maintenance application, in a prosecution for bigamy, or by a third party asserting an inconsistent right.

It can be raised after one or both parties have died, which is when it most often arises — a second “wife” claiming an estate where the first marriage subsisted.

But obtaining a decree is still sensible

A decree of nullity under section 35 of the Matrimonial Causes Act (Chapter 282) produces an authoritative record.

Without one, a person who remarries relying on the first marriage being void takes the risk that a court will later disagree — in which case the second marriage is void and bigamy has been committed.

A decree also opens the door to ancillary relief: maintenance, custody and settlement of property under Part VII of that Act.

Why a voidable marriage is different

Valid until set aside

A voidable marriage produces every normal consequence of marriage: the parties are spouses, the children are legitimate, property and succession rights operate, and a further marriage would be bigamous.

Only a decree of nullity changes that, and section 39 of the Matrimonial Causes Act governs the effect of a decree of nullity of a voidable marriage.

The grounds are personal to the parties

Each section 22 ground concerns a matter between the spouses: consummation, mental fitness for marriage, disease, and the paternity of a pregnancy. They are matters the parties may choose to overlook.

That is why only the parties may petition, and why section 38 of the Matrimonial Causes Act restricts the grounds — in general requiring the petitioner to have been ignorant of the facts at the time of the marriage and to have acted promptly.

A spouse who knew of the condition and married anyway, or who lived with the other for years afterwards, will not be permitted to rely on it.

The position of children

Children are protected either way

Section 54 of the Marriage Act deals with the legitimacy of children of certain void marriages, and section 2 of the Matrimonial Causes Act deals with the application of that Act in relation to certain children.

Independently of legitimacy, the Lukautim Pikinini Act 2015 operates on parental responsibility and the duty to maintain a child regardless of the parents’ marital status, and the Family Court may make parenting orders and maintenance orders.

Working out which applies

  1. Check section 17 first. Section 22 applies only to a marriage “not being a marriage that is void”.
  2. Check the exceptions. Section 17(1) is subject to section 17(2) and to sections 20 and 21 — a Judge’s permission removes the prohibited-degrees ground.
  3. Check the date. Section 23 preserves the validity or invalidity of marriages before 21 January 1965, and applies the common law rules of private international law where appropriate.
  4. Then consider the remedy. Both void and voidable marriages are dealt with by a decree of nullity under section 35 of the Matrimonial Causes Act.

Sources

Check the section yourself

Before relying on anything here, read the current text of the Marriage Act (Chapter 280) and check for later amendments. If a decision matters to you, get advice — start with the Office of the Public Solicitor, or find a firm in the law firms directory.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about Papua New Guinea law and does not constitute legal advice. Laws may change, and their application depends on individual circumstances. You should obtain professional legal advice for your specific situation. Read the full disclaimer.