HomeCompany LawEnforcement

Can a Shareholder Sue the Company?

Yes, for breach of a duty the company owes them as a shareholder. The Court may also order the board to take action the constitution or the Act requires — and where many shareholders share the same interest, one may be appointed to represent them all.

The company law series, no. 77 · Enforcing rights against the company · 5 min read

Sections 149 to 151 of the Companies Act 1997 complete the shareholder’s toolkit — this time against the company itself.

Section 149 — the personal action

Section 149

A shareholder of a company may bring an action against the company for breach of a duty owed by the company to him as a shareholder.

What duties the company owes a shareholder

Many, and most are statutory. Among them:

Above all, the constitution is binding as a contract between the company and each shareholder under section 32(1)(a) — so a breach of the constitution is itself a breach of duty owed to the shareholder.

The reflective loss principle applies here too

Section 149 does not contain the express bar found in section 147(2). But the same logic governs: a claim that in substance seeks to recover a fall in share value caused by a loss to the company is not a claim for breach of a duty owed to the shareholder as a shareholder. The route for company losses remains a derivative action under section 143.

Section 150 — an order requiring the board to act

Section 150

Notwithstanding section 149, the Court may, on the application of a shareholder, where it is satisfied that it is just and equitable to do so, make an order requiring the board to take any action that is required to be taken by the constitution or this Act — and may grant such other consequential relief as it thinks fit.

Section 150 is the company-facing twin of section 148. Section 148 orders a director to act; section 150 orders the board. Both dispense with the requirement that the duty be owed to the shareholder personally, and both turn on what is just and equitable.

Choosing between the mandatory remedies
ProvisionWho is orderedWho may applyLimit
s 142(1)(b)Any person required to do something by the Act or constitutionCompany, director, shareholder, entitled person, RegistrarNot available for completed conduct; no undertaking as to damages required
s 148A directorA shareholderCourt must find it just and equitable
s 150The boardA shareholderCourt must find it just and equitable
s 104Orders a meeting to be held and conducted as directedDirector, shareholder or creditorImpracticability, or the interests of the company

Section 151 — representative proceedings

Section 151

Where a shareholder brings proceedings against the company or a director, and other shareholders have the same or substantially the same interest in relation to the subject-matter, the Court may appoint that shareholder to represent all or some of the shareholders having that interest, and may make such order as it thinks fit, including an order —

(a) as to the control and conduct of the proceedings; and

(b) as to the costs of the proceedings; and

(c) directing the distribution of any amount ordered to be paid by a defendant among the shareholders represented.

One action for many shareholders

Section 151 avoids a multiplicity of identical claims. It applies to proceedings against the company or a director, so it covers both section 149 and section 147 claims.

Paragraph (c) is the practical heart of it: the Court can direct how a single award is distributed among the represented shareholders, which is what makes an aggregate claim workable. Paragraph (b) lets the Court settle costs at the outset — important where the representative shareholder is funding the litigation for the group.

The test is “the same or substantially the same interest”, so the class must be genuinely aligned. Shareholders in different classes, or whose complaints differ in substance, may need separate proceedings — or may constitute different interest groups for other purposes of the Act.

Choosing and running the claim

  1. Identify whose loss it is. A company loss goes to a derivative action; a personal loss to sections 147 or 149.
  2. Ask whether you need money or action. If action, sections 148, 150 or 142 are quicker and cheaper than damages.
  3. Move before the conduct is completed if you want a section 142 injunction — and note there is no undertaking as to damages required.
  4. Consider section 152 as well. It is the widest remedy, it covers former shareholders and entitled persons, and its orders include requiring the company or another person to acquire your shares.
  5. Gather the documents first using sections 216 and 219, or a section 220 investigation.
  6. Group the claims under section 151 where others are similarly affected, and ask for costs and distribution directions at the outset.

Sources

  • Companies Act 1997 — ss 32, 45, 65, 67, 75, 90A, 91–93, 99, 101, 102, 104, 141–152, 209–212, 216–220; Schedule 2
Check the section yourself

Before relying on anything here, read the current text of the Companies Act 1997 and check for later amendments. If a decision matters to you, get advice — start with the Office of the Public Solicitor, or find a firm in the law firms directory.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about Papua New Guinea law and does not constitute legal advice. Laws may change, and their application depends on individual circumstances. You should obtain professional legal advice for your specific situation. Read the full disclaimer.