HomeCopyrightNeighbouring rights

Do You Have to Pay to Play a Sound Recording in Public?

Yes. Where a sound recording published for commercial purposes is broadcast, otherwise communicated to the public, or publicly performed, a single equitable remuneration is payable by the user to the producer — and unless otherwise agreed, the producer must pass half of it to the performers.

The copyright series, no. 21 · Performers, producers and broadcasters · 5 min read

Section 23 of the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act 2000 is unusual: it does not give a right to prohibit, but a right to be paid.

Section 23(1) — the remuneration right

Section 23(1)

Where a sound recording published for commercial purposes, or a reproduction of such a recording, is used directly for broadcasting or other communication to the public, or is publicly performed, a single equitable remuneration for the performer or performers and the producer of the sound recording shall be paid by the user to the producer.

Why this matters to businesses, not just broadcasters

Three uses trigger the obligation: broadcasting, other communication to the public, and public performance.

Public performance is defined in section 2 to include, for a sound recording, making the recorded sounds audible at a place where persons outside the normal circle of the family and its closest acquaintances are or can be present.

So playing recorded music in a hotel, a bar, a restaurant, a shop, a bus, a gym or a nightclub is a public performance, and section 23 makes a payment due. It is not optional and it does not require a licence negotiation — the obligation to pay arises from the use itself.

A right to remuneration, not a right to stop

Section 22 gives the producer exclusive rights over reproduction, importation, first sale, rental and making available online. It gives no exclusive right over broadcasting or public performance.

Section 23 supplies the substitute. The user does not need permission; the user needs to pay. That structure keeps radio, television and background music workable while ensuring the people who made the recording share in the value.

Note the words “a single equitable remuneration”. One payment covers both the performers and the producer, and it is paid by the user to the producer — so a business dealing with the producer discharges the whole obligation under section 23.

Section 23(2) — the split

Section 23(2)

Unless otherwise agreed between the performers and the producer, half of the amount received by the producer under subsection (1) shall be paid by the producer to the performer or performers.

A default that can be contracted away

The 50–50 split is a default, displaced by agreement. A recording contract may provide for a different share.

That makes section 23(2) one of the clauses a performer should look for. It works with section 21(5), which preserves the performer’s right to agree by written agreement on such terms and conditions as are most favourable to him.

Note the direction of the obligation: the producer collects and then accounts to the performers. Performers should therefore ensure the contract also deals with reporting and payment mechanics, not only the percentage.

“Published for commercial purposes”

Section 23(4) — the deeming provision

A sound recording that has been made available to the public by wire or wireless means in such a way that members of the public may access it from a place and at a time individually chosen by them shall be considered as if it has been published for commercial purposes.

Streaming counts as commercial publication

The definition of published in section 2 requires tangible copies made available to the public in a reasonable quantity. A recording released only online would not meet it.

Section 23(4) closes the gap. A recording made available on demand is treated as published for commercial purposes, so its subsequent broadcast or public performance attracts the remuneration right.

Recordings that are not published for commercial purposes — a private recording, an archival tape, a demo never released — fall outside section 23 altogether. Broadcasting or performing those engages the producer’s and performers’ ordinary rights instead.

The other payments in the same transaction

Rights engaged by playing a recording in public
Right holderRight engagedNature
Composer and lyricist (or their assignee)Public performance — s 6(1)(h); broadcasting — s 6(1)(i); communication to the public — s 6(1)(j)Exclusive right — permission required
Producer of the recordingSection 23 remunerationRight to be paid — no permission required
PerformersHalf the section 23 remuneration, unless otherwise agreedPaid through the producer
Broadcasting organisationWhere a broadcast is being relayed — s 24(1)(b), communication to the public of the broadcastExclusive right
Paying section 23 does not clear the song

This is the point most often missed. Section 23 deals with the recording. The musical and literary work recorded is protected by copyright, and its owner holds exclusive rights of public performance, broadcasting and communication to the public under section 6(1)(h), (i) and (j).

A venue that pays the producer under section 23 still needs authorisation from the owner of the copyright in the songs. And a venue relaying a broadcast — a television or radio feed — also engages the broadcaster’s exclusive right under section 24(1)(b).

Section 23(3) — duration

Section 23(3)

The right subsists from the date of publication until the end of the fiftieth calendar year following the year of publication — or, where the recording has not been published, from the date of fixation until the end of the fiftieth calendar year following the year of fixation.

The same measure as the producer’s rights under section 22(2) and the performers’ rights under section 21(6). After that the recording may be broadcast and performed without payment under section 23 — though the underlying musical work may still be in copyright, since its term runs for the life of the author and 50 years from death.

What section 23 does not touch

Section 23 is not subject to section 25 in its opening words, unlike sections 21, 22 and 24. But the limits in section 25 are directed at those three sections, and section 23 is confined by its own terms to commercial recordings used for broadcasting, communication to the public or public performance.

Note finally that under section 32, the provisions of any international treaty on copyright and related rights to which Papua New Guinea is party apply to matters dealt with under the Act, and prevail to the extent of any inconsistency — relevant because remuneration rights of this kind are commonly the subject of reservations and reciprocity conditions in international instruments.

Sources

Check the section yourself

Before relying on anything here, read the current text of the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act 2000 and check for later amendments. If a decision matters to you, get advice — start with the Office of the Public Solicitor, or find a firm in the law firms directory.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about Papua New Guinea law and does not constitute legal advice. Laws may change, and their application depends on individual circumstances. You should obtain professional legal advice for your specific situation. Read the full disclaimer.