HomeCases Explained

Cases Explained

Statutes tell you what the words are. Cases tell you what the words have been held to mean. This series takes decisions of the National and Supreme Courts and explains them in ordinary language.

Papua New Guinea is a common law jurisdiction with a constitutional overlay and a statutory duty to develop an underlying law from custom. The result is a body of case law that is genuinely its own — and often more interesting than the imported doctrine it grew out of.

Each case note in this series follows the same shape: what happened, what was argued, what the court decided, why it matters, and what it does not decide. That last heading is the one most commentary leaves out.

Cases discussed across the site

The decisions below are discussed in the articles listed beside them, and each is linked to the judgment itself so you can read it rather than take a summary on trust.

For case law arranged by point of law — the leading authority on each question, the decisions that followed it, and where the courts have divided — see the Legal Index.

Papua New Guinean decisions discussed on this site
DecisionWhat it concernsDiscussed in
SCR No 2 of 1976; Re Motion of No Confidence [1976] PGSC 17 Motions of no confidence in the Prime Minister How a vote of no confidence works
Premdas v The State [1979] PGSC 20; [1979] PNGLR 329 Non-citizens, natural justice and executive decisions Who has Basic Rights?
Public Prosecutor v Rooney (No 2) [1979] PGSC 23; [1979] PNGLR 448 Judicial independence and contempt What protects judicial independence
Amaiu v Commissioner of Corrective Institutions [1983] PGNC 19; [1983] PNGLR 87 Treatment in custody; harsh or oppressive acts Freedom from inhuman treatment
SCR No 1 of 1984; Re Minimum Penalties Legislation [1984] PGSC 13; [1984] PNGLR 314 Mandatory minimum sentences and section 41 Harsh or oppressive acts
Resena, Gaigo and Oala v The State [1991] PGSC 15; [1991] PNGLR 174 Custom, the underlying law and land The underlying law and custom
The State v NTN Pty Ltd and NBN Ltd [1992] PGSC 11; [1992] PNGLR 1 Freedom of expression and access to media Freedom of expression
Haiveta v Wingti (No 2) [1994] PGSC 7; [1994] PNGLR 189 The Speaker’s certificate and constitutional amendment The Speaker’s certificate
Nilkare v Ombudsman Commission [1996] PGSC 2; SC498 Leadership Code process and natural justice What happens at a leadership tribunal
Application by John Mua Nilkare [1997] PGSC 20; [1998] PNGLR 472 Review under section 155 and primary rights What is section 155(4)?
Peipul v Leadership Tribunal [2002] PGSC 1; SC706 Natural justice before a leadership tribunal What happens at a leadership tribunal
Re Public Prosecutor’s Power to Request a Leadership Tribunal [2008] PGSC 48; SC1011 Referral of a leader for prosecution How to complain about a leader
Re OLIPPAC [2010] PGSC 3; SC1057 Party discipline and how members of Parliament may vote How a Bill becomes an Act
In re Reference by East Sepik Provincial Executive [2011] PGSC 41; SC1154 A section 19 reference on executive power Section 19 special references
Namah v Pato [2016] PGSC 13; SC1497 Detention of non-citizens and section 42 Rights of non-citizens
Reference by the Ombudsman Commission; Re Public Money Management Regularisation Act 2017 [2020] PGSC 43; SC1944 Parliamentary control of public money Control of public money
Special Reference by the Bougainville Executive [2020] PGSC 42; SC1952 Bougainville and the national Constitution The Autonomous Bougainville Government
Re Section 21(2) of the Cybercrime Code Act 2016 [2024] PGSC 77; SC2608 Online speech and freedom of expression Freedom of expression
Where the case analysis lives

The Legal Index sets out, subject by subject, the leading Papua New Guinea authority on each point, two or three decisions that affirmed or followed it, and — where they exist — decisions taking a different view. Every case is linked to its judgment.

It covers, among other subjects, judicial review, indefeasibility of title, election petitions, sentencing, default judgment and dismissal, contempt, costs and customary land, natural justice, the Leadership Code and the underlying law.

How we handle cases here

A case note is a summary written by a person, not a substitute for the judgment. Courts decide on the specific facts before them, later decisions can distinguish or overrule earlier ones, and a case can be under appeal when a note is written.

Never argue a case on the strength of a summary — including one published here. Read the judgment, check whether it has been followed or overturned, and take independent legal advice before relying on it.

Finding judgments yourself

PNG judgments are published in the Papua New Guinea Law Reports and in the National and Supreme Court judgment databases, and many are freely available through the Pacific legal information services. See how to check the law yourself for where to look and what a citation such as PGSC or PGNC tells you.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about Papua New Guinea law and does not constitute legal advice. Laws may change, and their application depends on individual circumstances. You should obtain professional legal advice for your specific situation. Read the full disclaimer.